lunes, 29 de enero de 2024

We often talk about conservation in the context of species. But it’s the interactions which are the glue that holds the entire system together.

Todd Palmer

(https://n9.cl/fo6rx)


viernes, 19 de enero de 2024

Science Before Statistics: Causal Inference  

Richard McElreath

sábado, 13 de enero de 2024

GRAND SABOTAGE CLIMATIQUE: 

RÉVÉLATIONS SUR UN SYSTÈME CORROMPU

viernes, 5 de enero de 2024

Three-strip management: introducing a novel mowing method in perennial flower strips and grass margins to increase habitat complexity and attractiveness for pollinators 

Laurian Parmentier 




Flower margins are widely adopted as agri-environment measure (AEM) to enhance farmland biodiversity. However, perennial flower margins need appropriate mowing schemes to manage succession, especially in regions with high nitrogen depositions, and current schemes inadequately address the needs of arthropods, including pollinators. Effective management should provide floral diversity with staggered flowering times, creating varied sward structures for diverse habitats that support shelter, nesting, and mating sites.

To address these challenges, a novel mowing method, called 'Three-strip management,' is proposed. This method involves dividing the margin into three strips using curved instead of straight mowing lines. During each cycle, one third remains unmown for shelter, while clippings are removed to lower soil nutrient status and reduce succession. The use of overlapping curved mowing lines aims to maximize variety in patterns, fostering spatio-temporal variation in the (re)growth of perennials and swards. Unlike Regular rotational management, multiple uneven parts are kept unmown over winter, increasing the number of subzones in different mown states over successive years.

In this study, field trials comparing Three-strip management with Regular rotational management reveal positive effects especially during the second year, including higher bee abundance and diversity. Plant-pollinator networks also demonstrate increased interactions. While the study focuses on bees, the potential of the Three-strip management to support other beneficial insects is discussed. Given declining insect populations in agricultural landscapes, this paper offers insights into enhancing perennial flower margins as AEM to support pollinator populations. The novel Three-strip management presents a promising strategy for balancing management needs with diverse insect requirements, contributing to sustainable biodiversity conservation in agricultural settings.

https://pollinationecology.org/index.php/jpe/article/view/747

viernes, 29 de diciembre de 2023

sábado, 23 de diciembre de 2023

Landscape structure and farming management interacts to modulate pollination supply and crop production in blueberries 

Ramírez-Mejía et al., 2023.

Deployment of beehives in blueberry fields can buffer, but not compensate for the negative effects on honeybee abundance produced by surrounding large scale none-flowering crops. Such compensation would require high-quality beehives by monitoring their health and strength. The contribution of honeybees to crop production is not equal across production metrics. That is, higher abundance of honeybees increases the number of berries produced but at the cost of smaller and more acidic fruits, potentially reducing their market value. Growers must consider this trade-off between fruit quantity and quality when actively managing honeybee abundance.


https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.14553

lunes, 18 de diciembre de 2023

miércoles, 13 de diciembre de 2023

Power laws in species’ biotic interaction networks can be inferred from co-occurrence data

Galiana et al.,  2023

Inferring biotic interactions from species co-occurrence patterns has long intrigued ecologists. Yet recent research revealed that co-occurrences may not reliably represent pairwise biotic interactions. We propose that examining network-level co-occurrence patterns can provide valuable insights into community structure and assembly. Analysing ten bipartite networks of empirically sampled biotic interactions and associated species spatial distribution, we find that approximately 20% of co-occurrences correspond to actual interactions. Moreover, the degree distribution shifts from exponential in co-occurrence networks to power laws in networks of biotic interactions. This shift results from a strong interplay between species’ biotic (their interacting partners) and abiotic (their environmental requirements) niches, and is accurately predicted by considering co-occurrence frequencies. Our work offers a mechanistic understanding of the assembly of ecological communities and suggests simple ways to infer fundamental biotic interaction network characteristics from co-occurrence data.



https://n9.cl/ggtmr




sábado, 2 de diciembre de 2023

 Nature Beyond the Limits of Human Perception | Doris Mitsch

sábado, 25 de noviembre de 2023

Key tropical crops at risk from pollinator loss due to climate change and land use 

Millard et al., 2023.

Insect pollinator biodiversity is changing rapidly, with potential consequences for the provision of crop pollination. However, the role of land use–climate interactions in pollinator biodiversity changes, as well as consequent economic effects via changes in crop pollination, remains poorly understood. We present a global assessment of the interactive effects of climate change and land use on pollinator abundance and richness and predictions of the risk to crop pollination from the inferred changes. Using a dataset containing 2673 sites and 3080 insect pollinator species, we show that the interactive combination of agriculture and climate change is associated with large reductions in insect pollinators. As a result, it is expected that the tropics will experience the greatest risk to crop production from pollinator losses. Localized risk is highest and predicted to increase most rapidly, in regions of sub-Saharan Africa, northern South America, and Southeast Asia. Via pollinator loss alone, climate change and agricultural land use could be a risk to human well-being.


Response of pollinating and nonpollinating insect total abundance to the interactive effect of standardized temperature anomaly and land use.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adh0756